9/11 Conspiracy Theories or Spy vs. Spy?

BELLACIAO – Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And “Inside Job” – Collective Bellaciao
Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And “Inside Job” Greg Szymanski June 12, 2005

A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush’s first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is ’bogus,’ saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.

“If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an ’inside job’ and a government attack on America would be compelling,” said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX.

Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it’s ’next to impossible’ that 19 Arab Terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11.

1 thought on “9/11 Conspiracy Theories or Spy vs. Spy?

  1. What does Reynolds mean by a “controlled demolition?”

    Does he mean once the towers were struck that some demo team went inside to set explosives to be sure the towers collapsed (perhaps to obscure evidence and heighten the scope of the damage), or is Reynolds calling the attack itself “a controlled domolition” in that entities within our own gov’t were co-conspirators?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *